<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: April Forex Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/2007/04/30/april-forex-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/2007/04/30/april-forex-results/</link>
	<description>Rapidminer Evangelism &#38; Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:59:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/2007/04/30/april-forex-results/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 02:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/?p=64#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Gav,
What I&#039;m doing is completely counterintuitive.  I control my risk by taking multiple small positions where I can sit out 150 pip price swings.  I scale into the positions as long as I believe the fundamentals of the trend are still intact.  This includes averaging down in a loser.  Believe me, this takes balls of steel because you have to have confidence in what you&#039;re doing and what your analysis tells you. 

The one thing I learned from these currency markets is that they over react and over shoot constantly, you get stopped out too quick only to have the trend resume a short while later.  I thought, why not get rid of the stops all together and go with smaller positions based on a % of ,my trading equity.  Currently I use no more than 15% of my trading equity per position, which is awfully high but with such a small acct I need to take larger risks.

My ultimate goal is to use a 3% of trading equity position size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gav,<br />
What I&#8217;m doing is completely counterintuitive.  I control my risk by taking multiple small positions where I can sit out 150 pip price swings.  I scale into the positions as long as I believe the fundamentals of the trend are still intact.  This includes averaging down in a loser.  Believe me, this takes balls of steel because you have to have confidence in what you&#8217;re doing and what your analysis tells you. </p>
<p>The one thing I learned from these currency markets is that they over react and over shoot constantly, you get stopped out too quick only to have the trend resume a short while later.  I thought, why not get rid of the stops all together and go with smaller positions based on a % of ,my trading equity.  Currently I use no more than 15% of my trading equity per position, which is awfully high but with such a small acct I need to take larger risks.</p>
<p>My ultimate goal is to use a 3% of trading equity position size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gav</title>
		<link>http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/2007/04/30/april-forex-results/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Gav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/?p=64#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Well done tom.
Just out of curiosity , how do you justify your risk while you keep averaging down your losing position? I am interested in understanding the risk management of average-down style of trading strategy.

Have a good day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done tom.<br />
Just out of curiosity , how do you justify your risk while you keep averaging down your losing position? I am interested in understanding the risk management of average-down style of trading strategy.</p>
<p>Have a good day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

