February 2009 Archives
Dear Mr. President, I know it’s really easy to spend other people’s money but let’s face a reality here. No matter how much money you’re going to throw at the banking and credit system, it just won’t work. The banks are, for lack of better word, bankrupt. They went bankrupt because they were built on a shoddy financial foundation and took excessive risks. Now you want to continue to use MY TAXPAYER MONEY to keep feeding these pigs?  Heck, you don't even know HOW MUCH MORE MONEY it will take to solve the problem! Emphasis mine.Â
“We don’t know yet whether we’re going to need additional money or how much additional money we’ll need until we’ve seen how successful we are at restoring a sense of confidence in the marketplace,†Obama said in a news conference last night in Washington.Â
The president’s remarks indicate he acknowledges the assessment of many economists that the $350 billion remaining in the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program is insufficient to revive credit markets. The International Monetary Fund forecasts financial companies will need to write down over $1 trillion more of their U.S. mortgage debt. [by Rebecca Christie and Julianna Goldman]
What ever you and Mr. Giethner are planning to  do to help revive our economy is bound to be atrocious in nature and will NOT solve the underlying problems. Mr President, if you truly want to rebuild our economy into a powerful wealth engine again, I suggest you do the following:Â
- Let the bankrupt banks die
- Abolish the Federal Reserve
- Reinstate the Gold Standard
- Abolish fractional banking
Oh, silly me. I forgot, this will dethrone hurt the new ruling class, elite nobles, the bankers and will never happen until the people rise up and beat them to a bloody pulp in the streets.
Many readers know that I’m a big fan of Ayn Rand, objectivism, and of course capitalism.  I was thrilled to find this well written WSJ article a few weeks ago and it seems appropriate to share it with you now, given the current Obama economic bailout plan. Â
In the book, these relentless wealth redistributionists and their programs are disparaged as "the looters and their laws." Every new act of government futility and stupidity carries with it a benevolent-sounding title. These include the "Anti-Greed Act" to redistribute income (sounds like Charlie Rangel's promises soak-the-rich tax bill) and the "Equalization of Opportunity Act" to prevent people from starting more than one business (to give other people a chance). My personal favorite, the "Anti Dog-Eat-Dog Act," aims to restrict cut-throat competition between firms and thus slow the wave of business bankruptcies. Why didn't Hank Paulson think of that?Â
The current economic strategy is right out of "Atlas Shrugged": The more incompetent you are in business, the more handouts the politicians will bestow on you. That's the justification for the $2 trillion of subsidies doled out already to keep afloat distressed insurance companies, banks, Wall Street investment houses, and auto companies -- while standing next in line for their share of the booty are real-estate developers, the steel industry, chemical companies, airlines, ethanol producers, construction firms and even catfish farmers. With each successive bailout to "calm the markets," another trillion of national wealth is subsequently lost. Yet, as "Atlas" grimly foretold, we now treat the incompetent who wreck their companies as victims, while those resourceful business owners who manage to make a profit are portrayed as recipients of illegitimate "windfalls." [by Stephen Moore]
Do you not see the similarities between the failed policies over the last 20 years, including the one that is about to unleashed on us, and how it plays right into the plot of “Atlas Shrugged?â€Â  You’ll have to read the book to find out what happens in the end!Â
