<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on Ranking Football Teams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/2009/07/08/thoughts-on-ranking-football-teams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/2009/07/08/thoughts-on-ranking-football-teams/</link>
	<description>Rapidminer Evangelism &#38; Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:59:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/2009/07/08/thoughts-on-ranking-football-teams/comment-page-1/#comment-2639</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/?p=1703#comment-2639</guid>
		<description>@Bedo: I think I&#039;ll post the easynn data file</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bedo: I think I&#8217;ll post the easynn data file</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bedo</title>
		<link>http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/2009/07/08/thoughts-on-ranking-football-teams/comment-page-1/#comment-2638</link>
		<dc:creator>Bedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/?p=1703#comment-2638</guid>
		<description>Call me crazy, but the process of getting to the ranking system sure would make an interesting tutorial....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me crazy, but the process of getting to the ranking system sure would make an interesting tutorial&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/2009/07/08/thoughts-on-ranking-football-teams/comment-page-1/#comment-2637</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/?p=1703#comment-2637</guid>
		<description>@Tim: Now the trick is developing the ranking system.  I already have some strong leads on how to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim: Now the trick is developing the ranking system.  I already have some strong leads on how to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Troutman</title>
		<link>http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/2009/07/08/thoughts-on-ranking-football-teams/comment-page-1/#comment-2636</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Troutman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/?p=1703#comment-2636</guid>
		<description>Tom, two years ago I did almost the exact same thing and found that you&#039;re right - the ranking system is key.  I had pretty good success with it, the model would only get 2 or 3 games wrong each week.  It just took a lot of data entry time and I stopped doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, two years ago I did almost the exact same thing and found that you&#8217;re right &#8211; the ranking system is key.  I had pretty good success with it, the model would only get 2 or 3 games wrong each week.  It just took a lot of data entry time and I stopped doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/2009/07/08/thoughts-on-ranking-football-teams/comment-page-1/#comment-2635</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/?p=1703#comment-2635</guid>
		<description>@Bedo: I like the sound of &quot;Tom&#039;s Power Rankings.&quot;  Who knows, lol.
@Caprica: I need to create a diversion for myself or else I&#039;d shut down this blog completely.  I&#039;m pretty sure I&#039;ll have some readers complain, &quot;but this is a financial blog isn&#039;t it?&quot;  There is some information out there that says you can get a betting edge of about 55 to 60% with the proper model, you need a 53% edge to make money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bedo: I like the sound of &#8220;Tom&#8217;s Power Rankings.&#8221;  Who knows, lol.<br />
@Caprica: I need to create a diversion for myself or else I&#8217;d shut down this blog completely.  I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;ll have some readers complain, &#8220;but this is a financial blog isn&#8217;t it?&#8221;  There is some information out there that says you can get a betting edge of about 55 to 60% with the proper model, you need a 53% edge to make money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caprica</title>
		<link>http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/2009/07/08/thoughts-on-ranking-football-teams/comment-page-1/#comment-2634</link>
		<dc:creator>Caprica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/?p=1703#comment-2634</guid>
		<description>btw. speaking of predictive variables, after years of watching footy tipping competitions at the office, it is interesting to see how bad the real fans are at predicting who will win.  It is not uncommon to see those who have no real knowledge of the game and just pick the home team to be in the top quartile of the leader board every time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw. speaking of predictive variables, after years of watching footy tipping competitions at the office, it is interesting to see how bad the real fans are at predicting who will win.  It is not uncommon to see those who have no real knowledge of the game and just pick the home team to be in the top quartile of the leader board every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caprica</title>
		<link>http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/2009/07/08/thoughts-on-ranking-football-teams/comment-page-1/#comment-2633</link>
		<dc:creator>Caprica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/?p=1703#comment-2633</guid>
		<description>Interesting to see you have changed from stocks to footy.  A mate of mine who was into bond trading got into the horse racing prediction a while ago and has had an interesting &quot;ride&quot;.

After looking at numerous &quot;predictive&quot; variables, the best ones he found involved combinations of the owner and the trainer.  Why you ask?  It has partially to do with better trainers are good at training horses and the richer owners can afford to buy better horses for them to work with.  The other interesting thing is you get owner/trainer combinations that never fit the model.  He did not know what to do with these outliers until he realized that certain owners and trainers were fixing races.  He knew that if these horses appeared in the race, his model was never valid and he should not bet.

Anyway look forward to further posts in this area.  Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to see you have changed from stocks to footy.  A mate of mine who was into bond trading got into the horse racing prediction a while ago and has had an interesting &#8220;ride&#8221;.</p>
<p>After looking at numerous &#8220;predictive&#8221; variables, the best ones he found involved combinations of the owner and the trainer.  Why you ask?  It has partially to do with better trainers are good at training horses and the richer owners can afford to buy better horses for them to work with.  The other interesting thing is you get owner/trainer combinations that never fit the model.  He did not know what to do with these outliers until he realized that certain owners and trainers were fixing races.  He knew that if these horses appeared in the race, his model was never valid and he should not bet.</p>
<p>Anyway look forward to further posts in this area.  Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bedo</title>
		<link>http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/2009/07/08/thoughts-on-ranking-football-teams/comment-page-1/#comment-2632</link>
		<dc:creator>Bedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuralmarkettrends.com/?p=1703#comment-2632</guid>
		<description>So does this mean that soon we will have the &quot;Tom&#039;s Power Rankings?&quot;  And could the inclusion of your rankings be too far away for college football and the BCS! haha.

I&#039;m enjoying reading your work.  I basically learned RapidMiner (or a small piece of it) through your tutorials (thanks), and continue to learn from your posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does this mean that soon we will have the &#8220;Tom&#8217;s Power Rankings?&#8221;  And could the inclusion of your rankings be too far away for college football and the BCS! haha.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m enjoying reading your work.  I basically learned RapidMiner (or a small piece of it) through your tutorials (thanks), and continue to learn from your posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

